最高法颁布适用民法总则诉讼时效司法解释
来源:
|
作者:肯萨法律事业部
|
发布时间: 2542天前
|
543 次浏览
|
分享到:
最高人民法院发布《关于适用〈中华人民共和国民法总则〉诉讼时效制度若干问题的解释》（下称《解释》），自7月23日起施行。The Supreme People's Court ("SPC") has recently issued the Interpretations on Several Issues Concerning the Application of the Limitation of Action Provided in the General Rules of the Civil Law of the People's Republic of China (the "Interpretations"), effective from July 23, 2018.
近日，最高人民法院发布《关于适用〈中华人民共和国民法总则〉诉讼时效制度若干问题的解释》（下称《解释》），自7月23日起施行。
《解释》明确，民法总则施行后诉讼时效期间开始计算的，应当适用民法总则第一百八十八条关于三年诉讼时效期间的规定。当事人主张适用民法通则关于二年或者一年诉讼时效期间规定的，人民法院不予支持。《解释》提出，民法总则施行之日，诉讼时效期间尚未满民法通则规定的二年或者一年，当事人主张适用三年诉讼时效期间规定的，人民法院应予支持。《解释》规定，民法总则施行前，民法通则规定的二年或者一年诉讼时效期间已经届满，当事人主张适用三年诉讼时效期间规定的，人民法院不予支持。《解释》还对诉讼时效中止等问题作了规定。
The Supreme People's Court ("SPC") has recently issued the Interpretations on Several Issues Concerning the Application of the Limitation of Action Provided in the General Rules of the Civil Law of the People's Republic of China (the "Interpretations"), effective from July 23, 2018.
The Interpretations expressly state that, where the limitation of action commences after the entry into force of the General Rules of the Civil Law, provisions on the three-year limitation of action set out in Article 188 of the General Rules of the Civil Law shall apply. Where a litigant argues that provisions on the two-year or one-year limitation of action set out in the General Principles of the Civil Law shall apply, the people's court will not support its argument. In addition, the Interpretations state that, where the two-year or one-year limitation of action set out in the General Principles of the Civil Law has not expired yet when the General Rules of the Civil Law becomes effective and the litigant thus claims for the application of the three-year limitation of action, the people's court shall support its claim. Moreover, the Interpretations clarify that where the two-year or one-year limitation of action set out in the General Principles of the Civil Law has already expired before the General Rules of the Civil Law have become effective, the people's court will not support the claim of a litigant for application of the three-year limitation of action. Furthermore, the Interpretations provide clarity on some other issues, including the suspension of the limitation of action.
