两高公布办理虚假诉讼刑事案件司法解释
来源:最高人民法院
|
作者:肯萨法律事业部
|
发布时间: 2476天前
|
589 次浏览
|
分享到:
最高人民法院、最高人民检察院联合发布《关于办理虚假诉讼刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》（下称《解释》），自2018年10月1日起施行。The Supreme People's Court ("SPC") and the Supreme People's Procuratorate ("SPP") have jointly released the Interpretations on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in Handling Criminal Cases Involving False Litigation (the "Interpretations"), with effect from October 1, 2018.
日前，最高人民法院、最高人民检察院联合发布《关于办理虚假诉讼刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》（下称《解释》），自2018年10月1日起施行。
《解释》共十二个条文，从虚假诉讼犯罪行为的界定、定罪量刑标准、数罪竞合的处罚原则、刑事政策的把握、地域管辖的确定等方面作出了规定。《解释》明确，单方或者与他人恶意串通，采取伪造证据、虚假陈述等手段，捏造民事法律关系，虚构民事纠纷，向法院提起民事诉讼的，应当认定为刑法规定的虚假诉讼犯罪行为；向法院申请执行以捏造的事实做出的仲裁裁决、公证债权文书，或者以捏造的事实对执行标的提出异议、申请参与执行财产分配的，属于刑法规定的虚假诉讼犯罪行为；等等。《解释》还规定，虚假诉讼刑事案件由虚假民事诉讼案件的受理法院所在地或执行法院所在地法院管辖。
Recently, the Supreme People's Court ("SPC") and the Supreme People's Procuratorate ("SPP") have jointly released the Interpretations on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in Handling Criminal Cases Involving False Litigation (the "Interpretations"), with effect from October 1, 2018.
Twelve articles in the Interpretations embrace different aspects of criminal behaviors in bringing false litigation, including the identification of such criminal behaviors, the criteria of conviction and sentencing, punishment principles for the concurrence of crimes, understanding of criminal policies, and determination of the territorial jurisdiction. Further, the Interpretations expressly state that, where a party, either by itself or in malicious collusion with others, forges a fake civil legal relationship and invents a civil dispute by fabricating evidence and making false representations, thereby filing a civil action to the court, such practice shall be identified as a criminal behavior in bringing false litigation as mentioned in the Criminal Law; applying to the court for enforcing an arbitration award or a notarized document for the creditor's rights which is rendered on the basis of a made-up story, or raising an objection to the subject matter to be enforced or applying for gaining benefits distributed from the property to be enforced, on the basis of a made-up story, will fall into the scope of criminal behaviors in bringing false litigation as provided in the Criminal Law. Furthermore, the Interpretations provide that, a criminal case involving the false litigation shall fall under the jurisdiction of a court at the place where the court accepting the false civil action or the court in charge of the enforcement is located.
